Snapshot 9 | Young people’s relationships with their peers at age 12
Introduction
27.06.2023
01
Introduction

Relationships with parents, peers and special adults.

In the 12-year data collection wave, young people reported their experiences of their relationships with their parents, peers and non-parental special adults.

These three types of relationships are considered to be the central relationships that influence adolescent wellbeing. Examining these is important for understanding relational ties beyond the nuclear family, particularly for Māori where the concept of whānau encompasses a wider familial and non-familial system of connectedness and a collective responsibility for children.

Now We Are Twelve Webinar Series

Hear from research experts

Dr Rebecca Evans examines the networks of social and familial relationships young people experience at age 12 including with parents, peers and special adults.  Note this is a combined webinar that also includes findings related to disability from Snapshot 8.

Watch Webinar
02
Key findings
Most young people experienced high levels of trust and communication with their parents. Ninety-seven percent of young people reported that their parents accept them “almost always” or “often”, and 92% said they can “almost always” or “often” count on their parents to help them when they have a problem.
Young people also experienced largely positive relationships with their peers. Most young people answered that they trust their friends and feel that their friends are good friends.
Almost half (48%) of young people reported that they had one or more special adults in their lives – these adults came from many different areas of their social communities. Grandparents, uncles and aunts, and teachers were the three most common categories of special adult.
Often, young people who experienced weaker relationships with their parents were more likely to identify at least one special adult in their lives. For example, young people living in areas of higher socioeconomic deprivation were less likely to report strong relationships with their parents but were more likely to have a special adult relationship compared to those living in lower socioeconomic deprivation.
Rangatahi Māori and Pacific young people were more likely to have a special adult in their lives compared to sole European young people.
While transgender and non-binary young people experienced less trusting and communicative relationships with their parents compared to cisgender girls and boys, they were just as likely to identify a special adult in their lives.
Cisgender girls reported stronger relationships with their peers compared to cisgender boys and transgender and non-binary young people.
The majority of young people in the cohort had two or three strong relationships. Less than 1% of the total cohort of 12-year-olds reported having less close relationships with parent(s) and peers, as well as no special adult in their lives.
03
About the report

This snapshot examines the social and familial relationships of 12-year-olds in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Who are young people’s ‘parents’?

We asked young people questions about their parents or caregivers – “the people who look after you the most”. This could be one parent if they are mainly looked after by one person in their family (e.g. Dad or Aunty), or both parents if they are normally looked after by two or more people (e.g. Mum and Grandma).

What does a close relationship mean?

It is important to note that throughout this snapshot, while we refer to relationships that are ‘less close’ or ‘less strong’, this does not mean that the relationships themselves are weak or distant. These are terms we have used to compare groups of young people who are experiencing relationships in slightly different ways. While relationships are an integral part of a young person’s life, they are ultimately dynamic, and personal, and the weight or value of each relationship is dependent on many inter-related factors, including immediate and past experiences, personal needs and goals, family dynamics as well as wider societal and cultural contexts.

04
Our research methodology

To measure young people’s relationships with their parent(s) or primary caregiver(s), we used a validated 8-item scale, with questions including “I trust my parent(s)”, and “My parent(s) understands me”.

To measure young people’s experiences of their relationships with their friends or peers, we used a similar, validated, 8-item scale, with questions including “I trust my friend(s)”, and “My friends listen to what I say”.

To measure young people’s relationships with other important adults in their lives, we asked them questions about their ‘Special Adult(s)’. A special adult was by definition, “someone who does a lot of good things for you but is NOT your parent or guardian. For example someone (a) who you look up to and encourages you to do your best, (b) who really cares about what happens to you, (c) who influences what you do and the choices you make, and (d) who you can talk to about personal problems.”

Insight one

Young people’s relationships with their parents at age 12.

Our study found that young people generally experience positive relationships with their parents. Although young people are extending their social networks at this age and tend to spend less time with their parents, the primary caregiver-young person relationship remains central and important, as it continues to provide a framework for relating to others.

05
Insight one key stats

97% of young people reported that their parents accept them almost aways or often.

94% of young people told us they trust their parents almost always or often.

92% said they can almost always or often count on their parents to help them when they have a problem.

There were some differences in the parental relationship experiences of 12-year olds between ethnic groups.

Young people living in areas of high deprivation experienced less close relationships with their parents.

Figure 1. Young people’s reports of their relationships with their parent(s)
Figure 2. Parent-child relationship scores, by gender
Figure 3. Parent-child relationship scores, by ethnic identity

Insight two

Young people’s relationships with their peers at age 12.

Young people experienced positive, trusting and communicative relationships with their peers overall. We know that peer relationships are particularly important for young people aged 12 to 13 as they become less dependent on their parents and primary caregivers as the main source of social support. Peer relationships can contribute to shaping social, emotional and behavioural outcomes, and to shaping a young person’s identity and sense of self.

06
Insight two key stats

Young people tended to respond more positively about trust in their peer relationships compared to communication.

Cisgender girls reported stronger peer relationships than both cisgender boys and transgender and non-binary young people.

85% of young people reported that they trusted their friends almost always or often.

Pacific young people experienced stronger peer relationships than sole European young people.

42% of young people said that their friends encourage them to talk about their difficulties almost always or often.

Figure 4. Young people’s reports of their relationships with their peers
Figure 5. Peer relationship scores, by gender
Figure 6 . Peer relationship scores, by ethnic identity

Insight three

Young people's relationships with other important adults.

Our study found that 48% of young people identified at least one special adult in their lives. Young people are identifying members of their extended family and whānau, including grandparents, aunts, uncles and siblings, as well as members of the community, and recognising the special and unique place they hold in their everyday lives. This is an important finding given that positive and sustained adult-youth relationships both within and outside the family are important for young people’s development and growth.

07
Insight three key stats

Almost half of young people had at least one special adult in their lives.

For those who had a special adult, the average number of special adults was five.

35% of young people said they didn’t have a special adult in their lives.

Rangatahi Māori and Pacific young people were more likely to have a special adult compared to sole European young people.

Young people in areas of high deprivation were more likely to have a special adult compared to those living in areas of low deprivation.

Grandparents, aunts or uncles and teachers were the most common type of special adult.

Figure 7. Type of (non-parental) special adult

Insight four

Young people's networks of social and familial support.

We examined parent, peer and special adult relationships together to understand young people’s networks of support. We found that half of young people experienced strong relationships with parents, peers, and had a special adult in their lives, while nine out of 10 young people experienced two or three strong relationships. These are positive findings, given the connection between relational support and youth thriving.

08
Insight four key stats

Half of young people experienced strong relationships with parents, peers, and had a special adult in their lives.

Often where one area of support was lacking, another relationship was strong – young people can draw on multiple sources of support.

91% of young people experienced two or three strong relationships in their lives.

Just 0.6% of young people reported having less close relationships with parents and peers, as well as no special adult in their lives.

“Getting to have all the people in my life there for me and having loving and supportive family and friends”

Figure 8. Young people’s networks of social and familial support

 Relevance for policy
and practice.

These results provide the opportunity to further explore whether there are any demographic characteristics of groups who experienced strong and diverse relational support compared to those who did not. Furthermore, future research could explore the positive outcomes associated with young people’s networks of support in Aotearoa New Zealand, including self-esteem, mental wellbeing and educational outcomes. See the Mental Health Snapshot for an exploration of how relationships impact wellbeing outcomes, and the Covid-19 Snapshot to read about how young people with stronger relationships with their parents were less worried about the impacts of COVID-19.

Young people are generally experiencing positive relationships.

This study found that most young people experienced positive relationships in their lives. Less than 1% of the cohort reported having poor relationships with their parent(s), peers and no special adult relationship in their lives. These are promising findings given the vision of the Child and Youth Wellbeing Strategy, which includes domains related to children and young people feeling ‘loved, safe and nurtured’ and ‘accepted, respected and connected’. It is crucial to support and maintain these relationships for all young people and their families, as they are associated with many positive developmental outcomes for children, including self-regulation, coping, prosocial behaviour, and long-lasting positive relationships with others.

Material support may improve parent-child relationships.

We found that 12-year-olds living in the most socioeconomically deprived areas experienced less close relationships with their parent(s) compared to young people living in other areas. This finding may reflect how experiences of poverty and material hardship disrupt the opportunity to create strong relationships between parents and children. For example, parents living in areas of high deprivation are more likely to work multiple jobs, or work night shifts, which is likely to influence how much time parents are able to spend with their child. However, we also found that young people living in areas of high deprivation were more likely to have a relationship with a special adult compared to those living in the least deprived areas, indicating the strength of collective caregiving for many families.

Collective Care – Recognising who supports our young people.

The number and diversity of special adults identified by young people illustrates that they are sourcing support from many adults in their lives, including grandparents, aunts, uncles, teachers, and siblings. 12-year-olds are identifying members of their extended family and whānau as well as members of the community, and recognising the special and unique place they hold in their everyday lives. Our findings suggest that policy interventions for children and young people should engage with young people’s broader communities, which may better reflect their diverse and complex relational networks. Further measurement and analysis of relationships including recognising who provides care and support for young people at age 12 needs to better reflect a contemporary vision of Aotearoa.

Supporting transgender and non-binary young people.

We found that transgender and non-binary young people were significantly less likely to have strong relationships with their parents compared to cisgender young people. This finding highlights the need to improve whānau support around understanding and embracing a range of gender identities. Culturally-responsive guidance is particularly important, considering that transgender and non-binary young people are part of all ethnic communities in Aotearoa New Zealand.

References and
research methods

At Growing Up in New Zealand, we're passionate about advancing research and making sure our work is informed by a wide range of sources. That's why we've included a comprehensive list of references, along with an introduction and a detailed report of the research methods used to support the Growing Up in New Zealand study.

Snapshot 7 | Young people's experiences of depression and anxiety symptoms

Close
  • Racine N, McArthur BA, Cooke JE, Eirich R, Zhu J, Madigan S. Global prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents during COVID-19: a meta-analysis. JAMA pediatrics. 2021;175(11):1142-50.
  • Liu Q, He H, Yang J, Feng X, Zhao F, Lyu J. Changes in the global burden of depression from 1990 to 2017: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease study. Journal of psychiatric research. 2020;126:134-40.
  • Twenge JM, Cooper AB, Joiner TE, Duffy ME, Binau SG. Age, period, and cohort trends in mood disorder indicators and suicide-related outcomes in a nationally representative dataset, 2005–2017. Journal of abnormal psychology. 2019;128(3):185.
  • American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Vol. 5. American Psychiatric Association Washington, DC; 2013.
  • Luciana M. Adolescent brain development in normality and psychopathology. Development and psychopathology. 2013;25(4pt2):1325-45.
  • Maughan B, Collishaw S, Stringaris A. Depression in childhood and adolescence. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2013;22(1):35.
  • Hauenstein EJ. Depression in adolescence. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 2003;32(2):239-48.
  • Nemeroff CB. The burden of severe depression: a review of diagnostic challenges and treatment alternatives. Journal of psychiatric research. 2007;41(3-4):189-206.
  • Copeland WE, Shanahan L, Costello EJ, Angold A. Childhood and adolescent psychiatric disorders as predictors of young adult disorders. Archives of general psychiatry. 2009;66(7):764-72.
  • Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Ridder EM, Beautrais AL. Subthreshold depression in adolescence and mental health outcomes in adulthood. Archives of general psychiatry. 2005;62(1):66-72.
  • Katon WJ. Epidemiology and treatment of depression in patients with chronic medical illness. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience. 2022.
  • Keenan-Miller D, Hammen CL, Brennan PA. Health outcomes related to early adolescent depression. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2007;41(3):256-62.
  • Birmaher B, Arbelaez C, Brent D. Course and outcome of child and adolescent major depressive disorder. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics. 2002;11(3):619-37.
  • Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of general psychiatry. 2005;62(6):593-602.
  • Grant DM. Anxiety in adolescence. Handbook of adolescent health psychology. 2013:507-19.
  • Wehry AM, Beesdo-Baum K, Hennelly MM, Connolly SD, Strawn JR. Assessment and treatment of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Current psychiatry reports. 2015;17(7):1-11.
  • Hill RM, Castellanos D, Pettit JW. Suicide-related behaviors and anxiety in children and adolescents: a review. Clinical psychology review. 2011;31(7):1133-44.
  • Weissman MM, Wolk S, Wickramaratne P, Goldstein RB, Adams P, Greenwald S, et al. Children with prepubertal-onset major depressive disorder and anxiety grown up. Archives of general psychiatry. 1999;56(9):794-801.
  • Essau CA, Lewinsohn PM, Olaya B, Seeley JR. Anxiety disorders in adolescents and psychosocial outcomes at age 30. J Affect Disord. 2014;163:125-32.
  • Woodward LJ, Fergusson DM. Life course outcomes of young people with anxiety disorders in adolescence. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;40(9):1086-93.
  • Garber J, Weersing VR. Comorbidity of anxiety and depression in youth: implications for treatment and prevention. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2010;17(4):293.
  • Moffitt TE, Harrington H, Caspi A, Kim-Cohen J, Goldberg D, Gregory AM, et al. Depression and generalized anxiety disorder: cumulative and sequential comorbidity in a birth cohort followed prospectively to age 32 years. Archives of general psychiatry. 2007;64(6):651-60.
  • Ranøyen I, Lydersen S, Larose TL, Weidle B, Skokauskas N, Thomsen PH, et al. Developmental course of anxiety and depression from adolescence to young adulthood in a prospective Norwegian clinical cohort. European child & adolescent psychiatry. 2018;27(11):1413-23.
  • Copeland WE, Angold A, Shanahan L, Costello EJ. Longitudinal patterns of anxiety from childhood to adulthood: the Great Smoky Mountains Study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53(1):21-33.
  • Asselmann E, Wittchen HU, Lieb R, Beesdo‐Baum K. Sociodemographic, clinical, and functional long‐term outcomes in adolescents and young adults with mental disorders. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018;137(1):6-17.
  • Ministry of Health. New Zealand Health Survey 2022. Available from: https://minhealthnz.shinyapps.io/nz-health-survey-2021-22-annual-data-explorer/_w_c38a8dfd/#!/home
  • Social Wellbeing Agency. Youth Mental Health Project – Summative evaluation report 2016 (pdf). Wellington: Social Policy Evaluation and Research Unit (Superu); 2016 1.
  • Fleming T, Tiatia‐Seath J, Peiris‐John R, Sutcliffe K, Archer D, Bavin L, et al. Youth19 Rangatahi Smart Survey, Inifial Findings: Hauora Hinengaro/Emofional and Mental Health. The Youth19 Research Group, The University of Auckland and Victoria. 2020.
  • Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL. Screening for depression in well older adults: Evaluation of a short form of the CES-D. American journal of preventive medicine. 1994;10(2):77-84.
  • Irwin DE, Stucky B, Langer MM, Thissen D, DeWitt EM, Lai J-S, et al. An item response analysis of the pediatric PROMIS anxiety and depressive symptoms scales. Quality of Life Research. 2010;19(4):595-607.
  • Fenaughty J, Sutcliffe K, Fleming T, Ker A, Lucassen M, Greaves L, et al. A Youth19 Brief: Transgender and diverse gender students. 2021.

Read the full report

We’ve carried out more than 90,000 interviews and collected more than 50 million pieces of data to help inform policy and help give children the best start in life.